It’s not my opinion — it’s the appeals court’s opinion and the New York Times’ reporting of that opinion. They couldn’t have been more plain, and that’s entire

It’s not my opinion — it’s the appeals court’s opinion and the New York Times’ reporting of that opinion. They couldn’t have been more plain, and that’s entirely sufficient basis for my accusation. Upholding the position that the plaintiffs have standing, are likely to prevail, and more narrowly targeting the preliminary injunction is unequivocally not a finding against the plaintiffs. Claiming otherwise is blatantly dishonest.