3 ms·
The name "live.com" is awful for search, and yet Microsoft has poured millions into it. I don't understand why they don't just buy "search.com", "find.com", or
by mhartl 18y ago
The name "live.com" is awful for search, and yet Microsoft has poured millions into it. I don't understand why they don't just buy "search.com", "find.com", or something similar. The high price for the domain would be, on the scale of Microsoft's cash hoard, a reasonable marketing expense.
- johns 18y agoI doubt c|net is giving up search.com, but you have a good idea