3 ms·
It’s a reasonable question when the comment contradicts the headline, the article, and the decision. It’s not some minor detail in the article.
by catiopatio 3y ago
It’s a reasonable question when the comment contradicts the headline, the article, and the decision.
It’s not some minor detail in the article.
- acdha 3y agoYour comment is accusatory but not adding anything. A single random quote from a large decision with no context or discussion about the larger case doesn’t contribute the way it would if you wrote some original argument of your own based on your understanding of the original case and the appeal.
- catiopatio 3y agoThere’s an entire article, with a plain headline, backing up what I stated. The degree of motivating reasoning involved here is astonishing.
- acdha 3y agoYes, we all read the article. What value does copying and pasting a paragraph add?
- hackyhacky 3y agoThe headline omits important details. Do you really trust the media to accurately summarize this issue in a few words?
- catiopatio 3y agoI read the ruling myself, and the NYT accurately summarized it. Your summary, by contrast, is deeply, patently, and obviously wrong to such a degree that I must assume bad faith.