Both stats are recounting the past, filling in a blank slate with meaning. 15% of adults Work From Home most days, also 45% had Worked From Home at least once

Both stats are recounting the past, filling in a blank slate with meaning. 15% of adults Work From Home most days, also 45% had Worked From Home at least once a week in a month. It's not to prevent bad things, it's to cover up an already existing spillage of bad things. Most aussie communication is this way, the meaning is provided top down, and the logic is adjusted to make sure the meaning is the priority. Plain language and intellectual 'brevity' and silence when the meaning is ambigious, is often mistaken for the communication lacking real content. The exact opposite of 99% of articles here, where the concept is repetitiously over-described / buried in a cultural analogy / stretched across a metaphorical academic paper, and the reader has to figure out what the author means by deciphering the idea. For example, it is ambigious whether not the life satisfaction survey was caused by remote work or not, but who cares? It's the same meaning either way. The knowledge in the article is taken as a subjective study, relative to the people who did the study, and the official process has the final say in the end. The structuring of logic and rhetoric is not required to be objectified into flattened concepts.. as it is over the ocean, in the US. When it comes to structuring knowledge work. Aus is like a lower Britian - you can subjectively shape your work, but not to the highest degree. The US is like a lower Germany - you receive an objective structure for the work, but not completely, there is room to be Not Sure. So uh yeah, the article is doing it's job, conveying a meaning without extra fluff. Uhh why did I write this.