3 ms·
Why did you just reply to your own comment? So in the case of Trump attempting to ban TikTok [0] (Widely discussed on HN at the time) and was found to have vio
by rvz 3y ago
Why did you just reply to your own comment?
So in the case of Trump attempting to ban TikTok [0] (Widely discussed on HN at the time) and was found to have violated the first amendment [1] [2] was news on HN and this isn't? This still warrants a discussion right here instead of trying to suppress it.
This discussion completely belongs on HN as it involves big tech and thus this ruling is totally relevant news on this site not when it suits you or others who disagree and like more government censorship on those who they disagree with.
[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24016938 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24016938
[1] https://www.npr.org/2020/10/30/929656794/trumps-ban-on-tiktok-suffers-another-legal-setback https://www.npr.org/2020/10/30/929656794/trumps-ban-on-tikto...
[2] https://www.npr.org/2020/12/07/944039053/u-s-judge-halts-trumps-tiktok-ban-the-2nd-court-to-fully-block-the-action https://www.npr.org/2020/12/07/944039053/u-s-judge-halts-tru...