3 ms·
> You have completely missed the point. Incorrect. I'm strongly disagreeing with the core point of what you're trying to say. > I literally could not care le
by Zandikar 3y ago
> You have completely missed the point.
Incorrect. I'm strongly disagreeing with the core point of what you're trying to say.
> I literally could not care less what you choose.
Therein lies the problem. Your definitions are meaningless if you have no concern (aka tolerance) for how they'll be received.
- Veserv 3y agoMy point is the logic is inherently self contradictory regardless of the definition. To use a analogy. It is like I am saying: (A or TRUE) == TRUE. And someone is quibbling about the value of A. It literally does not matter. Pick any value. The sheer force of the rules of logic make the value of A irrelevant. That is analogous to my assertion, though obviously much stronger due to its basis in the underpinnings of propositional logic. If you want to disprove my statement then all you need to do is unilaterally propose literally any condition/action which results in a non-trivial paradox. I do not know how to make my argument any clearer. It is up to you if you want to think of a proper counter example or not, but I have said everything I care to say. Have a good day.