> Really? You mean the evidence you are ignoring from the CDC? Where is the evidence? You never presented it. You linked to https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/

> Really? You mean the evidence you are ignoring from the CDC? Where is the evidence? You never presented it. You linked to https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2022/s0901-covid-19-booster.html https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2022/s0901-covid-19-boost..., which literally does not contain the word "month". There's nothing in there about the vaccine "looses almost all effectiveness after 6 to 9 months". > I haven’t in this entire thread cited any evidence that didn’t come from either the CDC or the DHHS. Then it will be trivial for you to drop links supporting your position, right here, in a response to me. You still haven't done that. You don't even have to provide links to CDC or DHHS - I'll take something from a medical journal. Just don't get all uppity when you haven't actually provided that evidence yet. > Why do you think the government recommended booster shots six months later before there were any changes in the formulation. The human immune system slowly loses its resistance to disease over time after an immune response. This is normal. This does not imply that it's worthless after 9 months. That's the evidence that I'm asking for that you have not provided. One more try: in your comment, place your evidence in a block formatted like this: HERE: [link] "quoted section of text that provides evidence for your claim that the Covid vaccine looses almost all effectiveness after 6 to 9 months"