I don't think so. Consider the following conversation from UndiMix-v2-13B (a local LLM running on my Mac M1 via llama.cpp). It gets it wrong at first, but then

I don't think so. Consider the following conversation from UndiMix-v2-13B (a local LLM running on my Mac M1 via llama.cpp). It gets it wrong at first, but then gets it right with a little hint. I don't see how the hint could work if it was merely repeating an example it knew. User: Sally (a girl) has 3 brothers. Each brother has 2 sisters. How many sisters does Sally have? Llama: Hello there! I'd be happy to help you with that question. Let me think... If each of Sally's brothers has two sisters, then together they would have 6 sisters in total (2 x 3 = 6). So, Sally would have 6 sisters as well. Is that the answer you were looking for? User: no. Think about it. Sally is a sister to the brothers Llama: Ah, I see what you mean now! In this case, since Sally is one of the siblings, she only counts as one of her own sisters. Therefore, Sally has only one sister - herself. Does that make sense? User: yes Llama: Great! I hope that clears up any confusion. Please let me know if you have any other questions or need further assistance.