3 ms·
> Do you see the term “immunity” anywhere on the CDCs sight today with regards to the Covid vaccine? No, but that could be because individuals like you have ex
by throw10920 3y ago
> Do you see the term “immunity” anywhere on the CDCs sight today with regards to the Covid vaccine?
No, but that could be because individuals like you have extremely opinionated views of what "vaccine" and "immunity" mean, and they don't want further confusion to spread.
> Are you disagreeing that the Covid vaccine looses almost all effectiveness after 6 to 9 months?
OK, I was open-minded and willing to examine evidence that you provided, but you instead provided zero evidence and responded in a hostile manner. It's clear that you're not arguing in good faith. We're done here.
- scarface_74 3y ago> No, but that could be because individuals like you have extremely opinionated views of what "vaccine" and "immunity" mean, and they don't want further confusion to spread. So now your excuse is that the CDC is not being truthful or when evidence from reliable sources doesn’t agree with your worldview you dispute the evidence? How are you any better than the anti-cancers who do the same. I haven’t in this entire thread cited any evidence that didn’t come from either the CDC or the DHHS. > OK, I was open-minded and willing to examine evidence that you provided, but you instead provided zero evidence and responded in a hostile manner. It's clear that you're not arguing in good faith. We're done here. Really? You mean the evidence you are ignoring from the CDC? Why do you think the government recommended booster shots six months later before there were any changes in the formulation. I’m presenting quotes from the CDC. Not sone website I found while sitting on the toilet.
- throw10920 3y ago> Really? You mean the evidence you are ignoring from the CDC? Where is the evidence? You never presented it. You linked to https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2022/s0901-covid-19-booster.html https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2022/s0901-covid-19-boost..., which literally does not contain the word "month". There's nothing in there about the vaccine "looses almost all effectiveness after 6 to 9 months". > I haven’t in this entire thread cited any evidence that didn’t come from either the CDC or the DHHS. Then it will be trivial for you to drop links supporting your position, right here, in a response to me. You still haven't done that. You don't even have to provide links to CDC or DHHS - I'll take something from a medical journal. Just don't get all uppity when you haven't actually provided that evidence yet. > Why do you think the government recommended booster shots six months later before there were any changes in the formulation. The human immune system slowly loses its resistance to disease over time after an immune response. This is normal. This does not imply that it's worthless after 9 months. That's the evidence that I'm asking for that you have not provided. One more try: in your comment, place your evidence in a block formatted like this: HERE: [link] "quoted section of text that provides evidence for your claim that the Covid vaccine looses almost all effectiveness after 6 to 9 months"
- scarface_74 3y agohttps://www.yalemedicine.org/news/how-long-will-coronavirus-vaccine-last https://www.yalemedicine.org/news/how-long-will-coronavirus-... > Data about the vaccines waning contributed to a decision in the fall of 2021 to make booster shots available Why do you think boosters are being made available? Do you really think that if all I did was the J&J in March 2021 I would have any defense in September of 2023?