4 ms·
I hope you’re just trolling, I’ll bite. Privacy is not about what someone _might_ do with your data, it’s what they _can_ do with your data. It’s also that th
by berniedurfee 3y ago
I hope you’re just trolling, I’ll bite.
Privacy is not about what someone _might_ do with your data, it’s what they _can_ do with your data.
It’s also that they have your data, which means it can be exposed to staff or the world as the result of a breach.
- johndhi 3y agoDisagree on first statement. It's what they do with it that matters, not what the contract says. On the second point, sure, but so we have knowledge of what, how, and for how long, the carmakers are storing?
- travisporter 3y agoWould you sign a paper saying I can come into your house unannounced if I suspect you stole something? If you do not steal you have nothing to worry about
- TedDoesntTalk 3y ago> It's what they do with it that matters, not what the contract says. What they do with the data changes based on leadership (should we sell to 3rd party data brokers to increase our revenue or not?) It’s also out of their hands once a subpoena for that data comes from law enforcement.
- bradknowles 3y agoWith respect, I believe that both things are important. It's important to know what they do with that data today. It's also important to know what they could do with that data tomorrow.
- lWaterboardCats 3y agoI respectfully disagree with your initial point regarding "can" versus "what they do." Even if a company provides assurances and pledges never to mishandle your data or use it for nefarious purposes, there remains a risk that your data could still end up in the wrong hands.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]