> I doubt that would be affected much, and even if it is, so what? I don't think the goal is zero deaths So thank you for finally agreeing. Hot water is danger

> I doubt that would be affected much, and even if it is, so what? I don't think the goal is zero deaths So thank you for finally agreeing. Hot water is dangerous. No one says goal is zero deaths. But brushing over it, "oh, just some things will die" especially if you're talking about wildlife preserve is oil baron type of argument. > I care about things that actually affect the environment. If you cared so much about it you'd spend more time worrying about actual issues. You care about things that affect part of the environment you care about, right? Other environments - that's their problem? You know that EPA considers heated water a hazard, right? > Ok you really don't understand the scales involved here. Go and look up how much energy is involved in heating the Florida ocean by one degree, and compare that to the energy heating all the water from the deluge system by 100C. It's 1.3 million litres apparently. I don't believe you argue in good faith, if you don't understand why I brought this example, and try to make it sounds, that unless spacex heats the water to 100C, then it's ok. Bye, it's not worth my time.