6 ms·
By "Humans", I assume you mean something like "adult humans, well-educated in the relevant fields". Otherwise, most of these responses look like they would eas
by maweaver 3y ago
By "Humans", I assume you mean something like "adult humans, well-educated in the relevant fields". Otherwise, most of these responses look like they would easily beat most humans.
- DylanDmitri 3y agoI think most high-school educated adults, with the ability to make a couple web searches, would do fine on all these questions. It would take the humans minutes instead of seconds because they don't have the internet memorized. Me, Kubernetes Haikus, time taken 84 seconds: ---------- Kubernetes rules With its smooth orchestration You can reach web scale ---------- Kubernetes sucks Lost in endless YAML hell Why is it broken?
- seabass-labrax 3y agoI think you're spot on here. Yes, if one's trying to compare human and GPT intelligence, then you have to define what counts as memorisation and what counts as reasoning. But what most people outside of academia are trying to do is work out whether a GPT can effectively replace a human in some time-consuming task, and to be able to do so without access to the internet is rarely an important factor.