3 ms·
No, because that didn’t involve any sort of legislative action and is in fact clearly contrary to legislative intent.
by User23 3y ago
No, because that didn’t involve any sort of legislative action and is in fact clearly contrary to legislative intent.
- mannykannot 3y agoOn the contrary: yes, because that's irrelevant; the back-and-forth between disparate interests, and over interpretations of current legislation (and the constitution, for that matter), is just what normal democracy has that is lacking from other polities.
- User23 3y agoI don’t know what to say other than that is obviously and completely incorrect and anyone with even a cursory knowledge of history should know that.
- mannykannot 3y agoIt seems, then, that I am to be judged wrong just on your say-so, for no particular reason.