3 ms·
> Claude Instant v1 > Sally has 0 sisters. The question provides no information about Sally having any sisters herself. It isn't entirely wrong, is it?
by imdsm 3y ago
> Claude Instant v1
> Sally has 0 sisters. The question provides no information about Sally having any sisters herself.
It isn't entirely wrong, is it?
- ethbr1 3y agoTechnically, the answer depends on the definition of "sister" and "brother" vis-a-vis half and step variants, which would change the possibility space. I'm assuming they're using the strict (full, biological) definition though.
- layer8 3y agoIt is wrong, at the very least, in the sense that it claims no information was provided relating to sisters, while still inferring a definite number of sisters. If no information is provided, it should instead say that the number of sisters is unknown.
- bufferoverflow 3y agoIt's obviously wrong. It provides information about her brothers, and brothers' sisters. Thus providing information about her sisters.