As you say, they contain outdated and out right false information. Now, it's not merely being wrong once in a blue moon or one or two articles being a bit behi

As you say, they contain outdated and out right false information. Now, it's not merely being wrong once in a blue moon or one or two articles being a bit behind the curve, but the sheer egregiousness of its mistakes plus the lack of action despite being shown to be incorrect (see: w3fools.com) which in the eyes of many qualifies it to be called a "cancer"; certainly in the realm of web development resources, that label seems rather valid.