> He clearly violated the IP of many hundreds of people Or one journal. Authors didn’t get copyrights as the journal kept them. This was the point though is t

> He clearly violated the IP of many hundreds of people Or one journal. Authors didn’t get copyrights as the journal kept them. This was the point though is that the copyright there was/is immoral and that the papers should be freely available. And of course he didn’t trespass as he was a guest of a student. And I think the argument is that he didn’t even violate the journal’s copyright as the journal allowed download from the university network.