4 ms·
Well, it was an Ukranian offense against some Russian military infrastructure, which he probably feared would spiral down to nukes landing in Washington (becaus
by netsharc 3y ago
Well, it was an Ukranian offense against some Russian military infrastructure, which he probably feared would spiral down to nukes landing in Washington (because he's a genius, you see /s). Regardless, it's fucking obnoxious of Musk (what else is new) to think he knows better and to intervene in this war.
But then again, I have half a percentage of empathy, if North Korea was about to use your *aaS to launch a deadly nuke attack, would you suspend their service, or sit around and say "none of my business". Except in this case, as usual with him, Musk misjudged the whole thing and showed his preference for another rouge leader...
- hedora 3y agoHere’s the definition of Treason under US law: Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States. (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 807; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(2)(J), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)
- galaxyLogic 3y ago> ... adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere It seems to me, that is what happened here. Russia is an enemy of US, at least at the moment. Musk gave Russia (an enemy of US) aid by preventing Ukrainians from using drones against Russia. I am curious, how will US respond to Musk? Will Musk respond by claiming Russia is not an enemy of US?