3 ms·
The argument is not that the law isn’t technically followable. The argument is that the law is not based on safety and is capricious and designed to catch and f
by etrautmann 3y ago
The argument is not that the law isn’t technically followable. The argument is that the law is not based on safety and is capricious and designed to catch and fine people, which could justify ways of avoiding getting caught.
- chatmasta 3y agoThe argument from OP was: > the odds you get a ticket from a hidden camera are very low if you just respect the speed limits And the comment I was responding to was about how speed limits are unreasonable. So I maintain that the comment did not refute OP's point. The reasonableness of the speed limits is irrelevant to whether or not you get fewer tickets when you drive below the posted speed limit.
- ang_cire 3y agoThis is the driving equivalent of "just follow instructions"; you're ignoring that they are intentionally making the speed limits difficult to respect in order so that they can ticket you. Telling people not to get tricked is just victim blaming.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- beebeepka 3y agoWon't someone think of the overconfident and dangerous idiots who think they are race drivers
- etrautmann 3y agoDoes that characterize everyone transitioning rapidly from 65 to 35 back and forth?