2 ms·
I think you're missing the point. It's about "The loss of ACTs as an effective therapy". ACT has been the goto treatment for long now and what is at risk is an
by nakkiel 15y ago
I think you're missing the point. It's about "The loss of ACTs as an effective therapy". ACT has been the goto treatment for long now and what is at risk is an effective goto treatment which would leave each clinic with no easy and effective solution to cure people. Procedures are standardized and applied as per the WHO recommendations (which largely originate from the work in the Mae Sot area).
Mae Sot (really, it's the Thai-Burmese border as there is virtually no Malaria cases in Mae Sot as the mosquitos hate cities) is an area that has been leading the research and study of Malaria treatments for years now and is generally regarded and the trend-maker of Malaria as a whole.