4 ms·
I mean, sure, but by that argument, LiON would be: [x] it suffers from too few recharge cycles. [x] it lacks thermal stability at low or high temperatures. [
by MPSimmons 3y ago
I mean, sure, but by that argument, LiON would be:
[x] it suffers from too few recharge cycles.
[x] it lacks thermal stability at low or high temperatures.
[x] it is too likely to catch fire or explode.
at least, right?
- scythe 3y agoLithium-ion batteries are the benchmark for all of these, except maybe the explosion thing. They offer thousands of cycles where many prototypes only last a few hundred. They basically function in the range -10–+40 C while some prototypes do not even cover this range — sodium–sulfur for example requires >200 C. And, well, humans tolerate small probabilities of disaster, probably because our bodies do that anyway (as an early-life cancer patient, I would know).