Do you have an empirical basis for that? I'm curious because on one hand, Bun is advertising they are solving a major challenge for library authors, really bett

Do you have an empirical basis for that? I'm curious because on one hand, Bun is advertising they are solving a major challenge for library authors, really betting quite heavily on that being persuasive for adoption. The risk for Bun's adoption is that they're wrong, of course. The risk for Node's usage is that they're right, and library authors begin urging users to use Bun because it's 100x easier than making a useful library with Node. (This will happen very slowly, but things that happen very slowly can start happening all at once very quickly.)