3 ms·
Java GC has a non trivial overhead. I’ve moved workloads from Java to rust and gotten a 30x improvement from lack of GC. Likewise I’ve gotten 10x improvement in
by lowbloodsugar 3y ago
Java GC has a non trivial overhead. I’ve moved workloads from Java to rust and gotten a 30x improvement from lack of GC. Likewise I’ve gotten 10x improvement in Java by preallocating objects and reusing then to avoid GC. (Fucking google and the cult of immutable objects). Guess what, lots of things that “make it harder to introduce bugs” make your shit run a lot slower too.
- neonsunset 3y agoThis is not an improvement from lack of GC per se but rather from zero cost abstractions (everything is monomorphised, no sin such as type erasure) first and foremost, and yes, deterministic memory management. Java is the worse language if you need to push performance to the limit since it does not offer convenient lower level language constructs to do so (unlike C#), but at reaching 80th percentile of performance, it is by far the best one. But yes, GC is very much not free and is an explicit tradeoff vs compile time + manual memory management.