The total impact of non-violent crimes can be much worse; a blanket rule like that wouldn't make much sense. Would you rather be robbed at gunpoint with no phy

The total impact of non-violent crimes can be much worse; a blanket rule like that wouldn't make much sense. Would you rather be robbed at gunpoint with no physical harm and lose $100, or have your retirement savings entirely disappear in a fraud? What if that goes for 1000 other people also?