3 ms·
Yes, this is a big disadvantage. But have you tried Mamba that aims at implementing Anaconda more efficiently? It works really well in most cases. https://mamb
by scoresmoke 3y ago
Yes, this is a big disadvantage. But have you tried Mamba that aims at implementing Anaconda more efficiently? It works really well in most cases.
https://mamba.readthedocs.io/ https://mamba.readthedocs.io/
- bouchard 3y agoYou can use mamba's much faster solver directly with conda. conda install -n base conda-libmamba-solver conda config --set solver libmamba
- StableAlkyne 3y agoMamba is great, and I use it when possible. It's probably the single best thing to happen to Anaconda in years. Nowadays it's installed automatically, but up until a month ago you had to deal with the slow solver to install it. And fortunately it will become the default by Q4! The point I was making is the old solver left an impression on me that SAT is slow and inefficient, that's all really :)