I think a lot of us would agree that using AI to help redacting a paper isn't inherently wrong. It's more about how it's done. Having an article go through peer

I think a lot of us would agree that using AI to help redacting a paper isn't inherently wrong. It's more about how it's done. Having an article go through peer review and get published with things like "As an AI..." shows that people don't use it to enhance their work but to produce quantity over quality and that the articles aren't really reviewed.