4 ms·
I don't think my comment is sigh worthy really, because the article says you "might know it by the name 'lambda' or ... 'anonymous function'. Now "know it by t
by sixbrx 15y ago
I don't think my comment is sigh worthy really, because the article says you "might know it by the name 'lambda' or ... 'anonymous function'. Now "know it by the name" implies equality/equivalence at least to me (two names for the same referent). I guess it was just a poor choice of words, but that was my point to begin with.
- jasonlotito 15y ago> I guess it was just a poor choice of words, but that was my point to begin with. This is all called being pedantic. The idea was sound, and, let's be honest, unless you are completely obtuse (and, just to be clear, I don't think you are), I can guess that you understood what he was trying to say. But, you still had to provide a correction. It's not you. You aren't the only one to do it here. By our very nature, hackers can be very pedantic. Next time you read an article, and you have the sudden urge to say "Actually..." to correct a single thing, spend a moment to make sure you understand the context. What's the real idea? Not everyone is going to be an excellent writer. Let's focus on the message, not the poor choice of words. =)