4 ms·
Speaking only on the technical aspects, I think this is a cool (technical) idea, but over-engineered: > Both the Checker and Rule Manager services are built in
by ghusto 3y ago
Speaking only on the technical aspects, I think this is a cool (technical) idea, but over-engineered:
> Both the Checker and Rule Manager services are built in Scala with the Play framework. Data in the Rule Manager is stored in a Postgres database, queried via ScalikeJDBC.
>
> Google credentials are fetched from SSM using AWS Credentials or Instance Role.
For what's essentially a regexp checker? Good lord. Sounds like someone had fun though.
Speaking on the sociological aspects, I like it less. How many squiggly red underlines do you think it will take before the writers fall in line and switch their creativity off? There's something to be said for technology staying out of the creative fields.
Speaking on the irony aspects (emphasis mine):
> The goal of the Typerighter project is to address the above challenges with a universally available document proofing service, via an _easy-to-use and minimal interface_, that is accurate, transparent, and responsive to change.
- paulddraper 3y agoI fail to see the problem
- b3lm0nt 3y agoBrings to mind the recent overview that Ars Technica did of their infrastructure stack: https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2023/07/ars-on-aws-01/ https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2023/07/ars-o... Approx. 12 different AWS services and 30+ instances...
- 0cf8612b2e1e 3y ago> How many squiggly red underlines do you think it will take before the writers fall in line and switch their creativity off? That’s definitely a hard line to walk. On the other hand, not everyone is David Sedaris, and most writing should cut down on the cuteness and just give me the facts.