From reading these comments I can see a huge number of people have never had to conduct risk analysis in developing a product. Sure, the unexpected identical n

From reading these comments I can see a huge number of people have never had to conduct risk analysis in developing a product. Sure, the unexpected identical naming should not cause an issue, but when you're developing software like this you conduct multiple risk analyses and FMEAs to attempt to design a system that can handle faults that you can predict You can have failovers, safe states, recovery procedures up to the eyeballs, but if a situation occurs that you had not predicted then you're in unknown territory. Your system may handle the fault and fail safely, or it may cause an unexpected chain of events. TLDR: You can plan for faults all you want, but you can never guarantee it's 100% bombproof