4 ms·
To me, it's not about the fact they can be gamed but even the premise is misguided. Unless I trust a particular critic because "I like what they like", then it
by lbriner 3y ago
To me, it's not about the fact they can be gamed but even the premise is misguided. Unless I trust a particular critic because "I like what they like", then it is like asking everyone what political party they like or which make of car they prefer.
Deadpool scored 85% on rotton tomatoes and that makes sense, it was a bit different than the normal "Marvel" films and was well acted but it is totally not something I would enjoy.
Napolean Dynamite scored 32% and strictly speaking, it was a very oddball film. I really enjoyed it and there are more than enough quotes in it to still make me laugh over 10 years later.
The idea that crowd-sourcing reviews leads to some kind of useful truth is marginal at best but downright wrong.
- pallas_athena 3y agoI agree, actually. The problem is curation. I don't want to poll just about anyone. I only want to poll a selected list. Selected how? We can go by "seriousness", respect and proven knowledge, like the S&S Poll or the ASC for best cinematography [1]. Or, as you said, trust someone (or a group of people) because I like what they like. [1] https://theasc.com/news/asc-unveils-list-of-100-milestone-films-in-cinematography-of-the-20th-century https://theasc.com/news/asc-unveils-list-of-100-milestone-fi...