3 ms·
The baseline scenario had another similar take. http://baselinescenario.com/2012/03/21/jobs-disaster-looms/ http://baselinescenario.com/2012/03/21/jobs-disaster
by mey 15y ago
The baseline scenario had another similar take.
http://baselinescenario.com/2012/03/21/jobs-disaster-looms/ http://baselinescenario.com/2012/03/21/jobs-disaster-looms/
I disagree with both, are people going to scammed? Sure. Did Madoff scam a bunch of rich "intelligent" investors? Damn straight.
I personally fall on the line of personal freedom with reasonable safety nets, to me that is, allowing micro-loans, but continuing social security.
- mirceagoia 15y agoI guess everything we do has collateral damages. The problem is how we minimize the damage without interfering too much. It's like the man on a wire kind of thing.
- anonymoushn 15y agoIt seems silly to be opposed to Ponzi schemes that affect only the wealthy investors who buy in, but in favor of Ponzi schemes that affect everyone who pays payroll tax.
- Drbble 15y agoSocial Security isn't a Ponzi scheme; it isn't even an investment scheme. It is a welfare program with a funding model loosely designed to resemble insurance. Your payroll tax today does not entitle you to any promised future benefit beyond "whatever the SSA and Congress decide to pay in the future." Contrast that to a pension plan, which is a defined benefit from the moment you start working.
- jarek 15y agoNitpicking, but a lot of pension plans these days are "defined contribution" rather than "defined benefit". You put in whatever amount monthly (the contribution), what you get out depends on how the plan does in the next 40 years.