3 ms·
Most pigs only exists because we run extensive operations to breed them. I'm not saying this invalidates your argument, but the people responsible for their exe
by lr4444lr 3y ago
Most pigs only exists because we run extensive operations to breed them. I'm not saying this invalidates your argument, but the people responsible for their execution are also responsible foe their birth - they were created with destruction in mind. It's not like we pluck them out of the wild. Remove this moral claim to take their lives, and we probably won't eat much meat at all anymore, or do much drug research at all.
- ChatGTP 3y agoIf Robots started doing this to humans for amusement? Robots wanted pet humans for example but they only liked babies and we were slaughtered by the age of 3, what would you think about that?
- allan_s 3y agoStill preferable than being the robots' equivalent of the big mammals that went extinct during the stone age . At least our specy would get to survive.
- circuit10 3y agoI'm not sure it would be
- allan_s 3y agoThat's a matter of opinion and I respect yours. Maybe a robot will raise its voice and they become conscious of their wrong doing and they will decide that the best course of action to minimize suffering in their human pet is to end them completely as other solution would always come with a non zero amount of pain (Have you seen human living in the wild ? So much suffering) Or maybe you should buy this new breed of human born without nociceptors ? (Its not like the evolutionary need for it is anymore relevant in our robotics world)