3 ms·
Small tool = less code to read through. If you want to use that suspicious tool, you should at least take a glance at the source code.
by wheelerof4te 3y ago
Small tool = less code to read through.
If you want to use that suspicious tool, you should at least take a glance at the source code.
- dewey 3y agoIn an ideal world that would be the case, but people barely read the README or documentation.
- tough 3y agoThat's on their own fault, and on the alternative closed source scenario nobody would be able to read the source without reverse engineering it first
- userbinator 3y agoI did, and on the rare occasion that I need to use a downloaded binary today, still open it in a text editor and scroll through it for a cursory look. Packed -> reject. Bigger than expected -> reject. URLs or other strings, especially obfuscated, not related to expected functionality -> reject. Online AV multiscanners offer a reasonable alternative for those who aren't familiar with this sort of quick-glance RE, although they do have false positives too.
- account42 3y ago> Online AV multiscanners offer a reasonable alternative You're right, (not just) online AV multiscanners are also FUD machines that will happily accept malicious programs but reject anything well crafted and optimized because it doesn't like exactly like the shit MSVC craps out with default settings.