it's precisely the copyrighted aspect i'm interested in using to justify the redirection of the profits toward universal basic income - there's no way to solve

it's precisely the copyrighted aspect i'm interested in using to justify the redirection of the profits toward universal basic income - there's no way to solve the fractional royalties of how much revenue to distribute to individual contributors to the datasets; practically everyone online contributed to the datasets to some degree Japan has issued guidance that they won't use copyright law to dampen the pace of innovation, they are giving free reign to the innovators to capture any wealth produced as a byproduct of publically available (but copyrighted) data USA has the strongest intellectual property protections in the world, I hope we can do some good with it (as is I see copyright preventing more art from being made than it incentivizing, and I'd rather abolish it, but not before a basic income is in place so that artists don't have to feel like their creative work is their only asset they have to hold onto and protecy)