Population density across the whole nation can be misleading, because we're summing wild area, rural area, and urban area. What matters more is the amount of su

Population density across the whole nation can be misleading, because we're summing wild area, rural area, and urban area. What matters more is the amount of supportable infrastructure a given area could support, which is the population density for that specific area. From what I googled, Norway's urban population is about 83%, so cycling infrastructure should go a long way. It also shouldn't be terribly expensive to support rural cycling infrastructure either due to the lack of wear and tear that such infrastructure experienced compared to roads for cars and other vehicles.