3 ms·
>What's the benefit of those assets really? Not queuing with 100 people to visit a moldy overpriced Berlin apartment. Not worried about your retirement, if you
by FirmwareBurner 3y ago
>What's the benefit of those assets really?
Not queuing with 100 people to visit a moldy overpriced Berlin apartment. Not worried about your retirement, if your pension will be enough to pay for your rent when you're 80. That's what assets are good for. Having Spotify doesn't make up for that.
- dannyobrien 3y agoon the other hand, you have less worries about the closest 100 people in your world poisoning you to get hold of your mouldy cold castle. and actually having a retirement.
- freefaler 3y agoIf you're 15th century peasant in some of place in Germany you won't see retirement either you'd be dead by 45. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/life-expectancy https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/life-expectancy And your quality of life would be far worse than "in the queue with other 100 people"...
- gmerc 3y agoI love how this somehow is used as an argument for todays wealth disparity. “Well kids, you could have been a Jew under Hitler, so go kiss Elons feet and be thankful” to put the argument to the max.
- FirmwareBurner 3y agoSure, it sucked being a peasant, but the original comparison was that the peasants of today have it better than kings of the past.
- flangola7 3y agoThe comparison was to kings, not peasants.
- freefaler 3y agoStatistically the chance of being a king is miniscule... Currently king's don't sit in queues either. So the comparison is mingled. Compare kings of yesteryears with today's kings or common folk with common one today.