4 ms·
I believe you’re mudding the argument with unrelated statements I didn’t make: brain surgeons working on a farm. It’s simply: a worker who participates in the
by hcarvalhoalves 3y ago
I believe you’re mudding the argument with unrelated statements I didn’t make: brain surgeons working on a farm.
It’s simply: a worker who participates in the productive chain with labor can’t benefit from the value added by said labor. If thousands of iPhone are assembled by the worker, but said worker can’t afford even ONE iPhone, implicitly this means we value the worker 1/100000 of an iPhone.
If you think this is fair and proportional compensation, ok, but that’s an opinion. It’s not a natural law. I don’t think wage stagnation and pornographic profit margins are fair.
- kbutler 3y agoThis clearly demonstrates that the worker's labor is not the primary source of value of the product.