2 ms·

I use `exa` (and now `eza`) because it provides a better experience than GNU `ls`, IMHO. Sure, I don't _need_ it, but it's nice. I don't see any downside, espec

I use `exa` (and now `eza`) because it provides a better experience than GNU `ls`, IMHO. Sure, I don't _need_ it, but it's nice. I don't see any downside, especially since I've aliased it to `ls` since time immemorial and thus I only need to re-alias eza to ls again.

59nadir 3y ago
> I use `exa` (and now `eza`) because it provides a better than GNU `ls`, IMHO. A better what?
- qalmakka 3y ago
  You got me before I corrected my comment :)