3 ms·
Most people don't type `ls` directly either. Aliases like `l`, `ll` and `la` are very common, in which case it really doesn't matter which tool you're using. I
by imiric 3y ago
Most people don't type `ls` directly either. Aliases like `l`, `ll` and `la` are very common, in which case it really doesn't matter which tool you're using.
I've been using `exa` for years, and my aliases work regardless if it's installed or not. I just get a better UX if it is.
- meepmorp 3y ago> Most people don't type `ls` directly either. Aliases like `l`, `ll` and `la` are very common, in which case it really doesn't matter which tool you're using. Huh. I always use plain ls with flags and deliberately unset aliases like ll. I guess I'm weird.
- jjgreen 3y agoYou're not alone, is saving one character worth losing the muscle-memory?
- jjice 3y agoI like ll a lot for ls -ahlF, but I do run into its absence a lot on a remote machine. At that point, I'll just set the alias though.
- imiric 3y agoIt's hardly one character. I never need the plain output of `ls` in interactive sessions. Here are my aliases: if type exa >/dev/null 2>&1; then alias l='exa -alg --color=always --group-directories-first --git' alias ll='exa -aliSgh --color=always --group-directories-first --git' alias lt='exa -@alT --color=always --git' alias lr='exa -alg --sort=modified --color=always --group-directories-first --git' else alias l='ls -alh --group-directories-first' alias ll='ls -al --group-directories-first' alias lr='ls -ltrh --group-directories-first' fi I still retain `ls -ltrh` in my muscle memory, but after years of typing it, `lr` has saved me a lot of time and effort. Aliases are not just a way to type less. They also serve as a way to define configuration. If I ever need to tweak the output for all my usage of `ls`, I can just add it to all aliases, as I've done for `--group-directories-first`.