> Historically, revolutions are bloody and generally do not end well. Cultural revolutions less so. Historically, major changes only come with a bloodshed, you

> Historically, revolutions are bloody and generally do not end well. Cultural revolutions less so. Historically, major changes only come with a bloodshed, you forgot that part. We speak highly of Gandhi because he's an exception to this rule, not the norm. (And blood was shed in that case as well) The corollary is, don't expect much to change until there's a major societal break and pushback. That is, unless you have drunk the kool aid of modern politics and think your party will fix things for real, this time. In Britain, I'm less concerned about King Charles III and its effect on the populace, than Starmer, Sunak, and any other idiot in Westminster. They're the ones writing the government laws and budget for their own interests.