It points to the question of why they would go for something so meek when they have the power to be effective. If the FCC displays submissiveness to the markets

It points to the question of why they would go for something so meek when they have the power to be effective. If the FCC displays submissiveness to the markets they're supposed to regulate then I want a reason for it, because I'm worried they're in some guy's pockets Second issue is a cybersecurity label from a trusted source is already something that can be issued, by, say, the ISO consortium. You don't need the FCC to do that. Third issue is while the FCC is doing that, they're not doing something else. Fourth issue is while they're not doing something that works, the consumer still faces the issues that this was supposed to solve!