3 ms·
https://www.techspot.com/review/2731-starfield-gpu-benchmark/ https://www.techspot.com/review/2731-starfield-gpu-benchmark... Surprise my 1080ti still there. A
by ngcc_hk 3y ago
https://www.techspot.com/review/2731-starfield-gpu-benchmark/ https://www.techspot.com/review/2731-starfield-gpu-benchmark...
Surprise my 1080ti still there. And I wonder is it because it is an in-house engine and hence 4090 is not the top?
- brucethemoose2 3y agoThe 1080 TI is a classic still trucking GPU. Conspiracy theorists would say BGS optimized for AMD, but BGS games have always have weird performance characteristics, and they probably optimized for (AMD) consoles. Performance across the board looks pretty nasty TBH.
- polka_haunts_us 3y agoI bought a 6800XT because I was due for an upgrade anyways (I've come a long way since playing Skyrim 20 FPS low on intel integrated graphics laptop) and it came with the game. I'm playing it on 1080p high everything. Realizing that isn't exactly dripping in ambition for that tier of card, I haven't run into any serious problems. The first big city you end up is definitely chewing frames but the rest of the game works fine...mostly. I will say I walked into a coniferous forest for the first time, and while it was maintaing 60 FPS, the card was sounding and heating up like it was going to explode more than it had at any other point in 30ish hours of play. The forest had this thick layer of fog over it too so you couldn't see too far ahead of you (and therefore the game didn't have to render too much), so I think some areas are more problematic than others.