3 ms·

You must not have talked to anyone that uses templates extensively.

• Arelius 15y ago
  While I agree that C++ templates when used for anything but simple type generalization, are a gross, gross part of C++. I'd hardly call that core to the C++ syntax. However, I'd also argue that using templates to that extent is misuse. Eventually, it becomes a better idea to simplify your approach, or invest in a decent macro preprocessor. I for instance feel that many of the template heavy boost libraries, while powerful, only decrease maintainability of a system in the long-run.
  • gecko 15y ago
    While I agree that C++ templates when used for anything but simple type generalization, are a gross, gross part of C++. I'd hardly call that core to the C++ syntax. You're welcome to feel that way, but template abuse is simply a given with 99% of the C++ that crosses my screen these days. It's pervasive in Boost, it's pervasive in the STL (especially in C++11), it's pervasive in libraries like ATL and WTL. You can write C++ that avoids these parts of the language, but you are in the distinct minority in doing so. I think my complaint about C++ syntax is fair.
    • Arelius 15y ago
      I'd hardly call the STL, ATL, or WTL particularly heinous abuses of the template system.. And the syntax, is in general, pretty reasonable... Boost on the other hand...