3 ms·
Both of those links support my position, and refute yours. Did you read them? edit: for the downvoters, here is a direct quote (emphasis added) from the first
by jmillikin 15y ago
Both of those links support my position, and refute yours. Did you read them?
edit: for the downvoters, here is a direct quote (emphasis added) from the first link (which covers combinations of GPL/non-GPL code):
"""If a library is released under the GPL (not the LGPL), does that mean that any software which uses it has to be under the GPL or a GPL-compatible license?"""