>no good reason Your original comment amounted to "It's working as documented, see here and here". But arguably the question was "Why does it work in this baff

>no good reason Your original comment amounted to "It's working as documented, see here and here". But arguably the question was "Why does it work in this baffling way?" Certainly that's how I interpreted it -- and while I didn't downvote your answer explaining that this weird footgun is actually documented behaviour, I got no value from either that information or your tone, which read to me as a little dismissive ("It's pretty clearly documented [, you lazy/incompetent person who didn't bother to look this up yourself]").