3 ms·
> "Says who? The only "requirement of capitalism" is that individuals are allowed to have ownership rights." This was extremely powerful @legitster. For some
by ransom1538 3y ago
> "Says who? The only "requirement of capitalism" is that individuals are allowed to have ownership rights."
This was extremely powerful @legitster. For some reason this cleared up economic theory to me. These threads get lost in worker rights, but, that has nothing to do with capital. Capital is about ownership rights. You should be allowed to own things and means to your own production. Socialism is about taking these rights away, the debate is which.
- jamilton 3y agoThat seems like poor representation of socialism. Socialist policies typically increase worker rights. You could see that as merely taking away rights from existing capital-owners, but it seems to me that it's clearly a case of competing needs. Any rights you give to a worker is necessarily a restriction on their employer.
- deadfoxygrandpa 3y agoyes, you're right. that's what we call "class conflict", it just means that different groups of people have different, conflicting interests based on their relationship to the work