3 ms·
It's malpractice. There was no justification or medical necessity to remove perfectly good teeth. Just another moneymaking venture from my credulous, overly-com
by NoZebra120vClip 3y ago
It's malpractice. There was no justification or medical necessity to remove perfectly good teeth. Just another moneymaking venture from my credulous, overly-compliant parents.
- nullindividual 3y agoUntil you’re in your 30s with impacted, infected, or rotting wisdom teeth. It is not always possible to care for them properly due to their location. Removal earlier in life is much easier to recover from.
- CyberDildonics 3y agoDid you ever go back and tell anyone that at 16 you knew that decades of basic dentistry were wrong?
- NoZebra120vClip 3y agoI did, quite instinctively, yes. My father apprenticed me in the natural sciences, so by 16, I definitely knew a quack when I saw him, and I could tell what is junk science just fine. Unfortunately, people who support the establishment have vested interest in propping up both quacks and pseudoscientific woo.
- CyberDildonics 3y agoMost of the developed world considers people who say they "My father apprenticed me in the natural sciences" to be the quacks. Unfortunately, people who support the establishment Who are you talking about? propping up both quacks Are dentists quacks? Is getting wisdom teeth removed the "pseudoscientific woo." It's interesting that you have all these claims and strong feelings, but no actual evidence to back up what you're saying.