3 ms·
Edit: link to my previous comment with a list of papers from the last time a similar thread was posted for those interested. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?
by stanford_labrat 3y ago
Edit: link to my previous comment with a list of papers from the last time a similar thread was posted for those interested.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37018392 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37018392
This was a busy summer for developmental biology, full disclosure that I am an author on one of these papers and my thesis work is in embryo models/early development. The Hanna group was unfortunately scooped by some unethical behavior but their model is superior to the other one in Nature by Zernicka-Goetz.
- areoform 3y agoWould you be open to giving a talk on the topic?
- ed 3y agoGiven the spectrum of talk opportunities you might want to provide a little context. There’s a big difference between eg “my twitter space” and Ted.
- areoform 3y agoIt would be indiscrete of me to say so. But always happy to chat privately! I can be reached on the username areoform via areoform.com
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- pvg 3y agoJust link your old comment next time since sometimes threads get merged https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&query=by%3Adang%20copy%20paste%20comments&sort=byDate&type=comment https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...
- stanford_labrat 3y agoThank you I wasn't aware, appreciate it.
- Metacelsus 3y agoI agree, Zernicka-Goetz made a lot of hype at ISSCR but the Hanna lab's system is better.