4 ms·
Not just "open-source", but actual MIT-licensed (aka Expat-licensed) Free Software: https://github.com/microsoft/MS-DOS/blob/master/LICENSE.md https://github.c
by Karellen 3y ago
Not just "open-source", but actual MIT-licensed (aka Expat-licensed) Free Software:
https://github.com/microsoft/MS-DOS/blob/master/LICENSE.md https://github.com/microsoft/MS-DOS/blob/master/LICENSE.md
https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:Expat https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:Expat
Huh. Was not expecting that. Nice.
Edit: Of course they won't actually mention Free Software, because they don't want to acknowledge Free Software. smh
- outside1234 3y ago> actually mention Free Software What would have satisfied you? I mean, MIT is "free software", what else do they need to say?
- paulddraper 3y ago> Of course they won't actually mention Free Software, because they don't want to acknowledge Free Software. What do you want, a love letter?
- RobotToaster 3y agoWell, a few kisses would be nice.
- npongratz 3y agoA sincere apology for the Halloween documents would be good start.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- chungy 3y agoIt's basically only the GPL family that mentions free software. They're the licenses forged out of the movement itself. Everyone else is just happy to satisfy the spirit of the thing without giving it explicit mention.
- circuit10 3y agoWhat's the difference? The way most people use the term "open source" means the exact same thing as "free software", so I feel like this just being pedantic