28 ms·

Yes. As I said in my previous post, remote workers are not required to rto. RTO only applies to non remote workers. Actually remote visits are limited because t

Yes. As I said in my previous post, remote workers are not required to rto. RTO only applies to non remote workers. Actually remote visits are limited because the offices are kinda full now. Or are you talking about let everyone going remote? That's transitioning into a fully remote company which is not happening

bluefishinit 3y ago
> Or you talking about let everyone going remote? That's transitioning into a fully remote company which is not happening This was the state of things before the RTO mandates. The whole company was remote until they started demanding people come in 3 days a week. https://www.cnbc.com/2022/09/07/andy-jassy-says-he-wont-force-amazon-workers-to-return-to-the-office.html https://www.cnbc.com/2022/09/07/andy-jassy-says-he-wont-forc...
- PreachSoup 3y ago
  Remote work from pandemic period is a totally different story. The companies are forced to let people to work remotely because of the covid, not they really want to go fully remote. My original post was about typical 3 days(hybrid) vs Amazon's 5 days(fully onsite). My stand is that hybrid is fine for certain people and positions if the people think that it's worth it. If you don't like it, that's fine. I never said you have to take non remote positions. I was only commenting on the Amazon's fully onsite issue anyway
  - bluefishinit 3y ago
    > Remote work from pandemic period is a totally different story. The companies are forced to let people to work remotely because of the covid, not they really want to go fully remote. Amazon's stock hit an all time high during this period. They chose to take that arrangement and modify it, now they have worker discontent (and a lower valuation).
    - RestlessMind 3y ago
      Citation needed on Amazon's stock price and WFH setup. I'd argue it was more because of crazy levels of money printing. As soon as stimmies dried up and the Fed started hiking interest rates, stocks dropped while we were still WFH.
    - oarabbus_ 3y ago
      The entire stock market hit an all-time high during this period. Because of $3 trillion from quantitative easing.

bluefishinit 3y ago

> Or you talking about let everyone going remote? That's transitioning into a fully remote company which is not happening This was the state of things before the RTO mandates. The whole company was remote until they started demanding people come in 3 days a week. https://www.cnbc.com/2022/09/07/andy-jassy-says-he-wont-force-amazon-workers-to-return-to-the-office.html https://www.cnbc.com/2022/09/07/andy-jassy-says-he-wont-forc...

PreachSoup 3y ago
Remote work from pandemic period is a totally different story. The companies are forced to let people to work remotely because of the covid, not they really want to go fully remote. My original post was about typical 3 days(hybrid) vs Amazon's 5 days(fully onsite). My stand is that hybrid is fine for certain people and positions if the people think that it's worth it. If you don't like it, that's fine. I never said you have to take non remote positions. I was only commenting on the Amazon's fully onsite issue anyway
- bluefishinit 3y ago
  > Remote work from pandemic period is a totally different story. The companies are forced to let people to work remotely because of the covid, not they really want to go fully remote. Amazon's stock hit an all time high during this period. They chose to take that arrangement and modify it, now they have worker discontent (and a lower valuation).
  - RestlessMind 3y ago
    Citation needed on Amazon's stock price and WFH setup. I'd argue it was more because of crazy levels of money printing. As soon as stimmies dried up and the Fed started hiking interest rates, stocks dropped while we were still WFH.
  - oarabbus_ 3y ago
    The entire stock market hit an all-time high during this period. Because of $3 trillion from quantitative easing.