3 ms·
2 days would definitely be better for the devs. That's how it works for lots of us even before mandate. So the significant change for lots of the ppl was from 2
by PreachSoup 3y ago
2 days would definitely be better for the devs. That's how it works for lots of us even before mandate. So the significant change for lots of the ppl was from 2 days to 3 days ¯\_(ツ)_/¯. That's the cost of staying in the company I guess
- ghaff 3y agoIt does feel as if there's a break point for me between 2 days and 3 days where a lousy commute is tolerable vs. one that's not. But there's also a big what you're used to thing going on.
- PreachSoup 3y agoI understand why 3 days is needed for certain positions. Even for ICs there are senior techleads who have less coding requirement but more design and pm requirements and they need to juggle projects with multiple groups and the same time. For them frequent communication with large groups of people is probably more efficient when it's done in person
- ghaff 3y agoThough at larger companies those people are probably pretty scattered around anyway. Not a single person on my (non-development) team is within hundreds of miles of each other.
- oceanplexian 3y agoI was going to say, what about those of us working for globally distributed companies? We should go to an office so we can then use a conference room to Zoom with some people in another office? I don’t see how the office magically creates better collaboration, actually it’s worse.